|
|
Rank: Sports Guru
Groups: Member
Joined: 9/4/2008
Posts: 232
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
I would say Beth because Beth has strength and technical moves where as all Chyna did was throw people around.
|
|
Rank: Sports Guru
Groups: Member
Joined: 1/25/2006
Posts: 682
Location: Lilydale, Melbourne
|
Awesome Kong would kill them both.. but Chyna would win this one.
|
|
Rank: Sports Guru
Groups: Member
Joined: 9/8/2007
Posts: 182
|
chippa7 wrote:Awesome Kong would kill them both.. but Chyna would win this one. no chance, Beth can actually wrestle, Chyna had testicles. Beth a far better worker than Chyna ever was
|
|
Rank: Advanced Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 7/1/2007
Posts: 139
Location: Brisbane, Queensland
|
Chyna's strength alone would scare any other woman haha
|
|
Rank: Sports Guru
Groups: Member
Joined: 9/4/2008
Posts: 232
Location: Melbourne, Australia
|
*The*Legend*Killer* wrote:Chyna's strength alone would scare any other woman haha
Not if you think about it. WWF out Chyna up against girls half her size. She only threw people around were as Beth has technical moves. I am a woman and Chyna doesn't scare me.
|
|
Rank: Sports Guru
Groups: Member
Joined: 1/25/2006
Posts: 682
Location: Lilydale, Melbourne
|
Beth can wrestle...but no matter how good you can 'wrestle' if your not as strong as the other person its always an uphill battle imo.
|
|
Rank: Sports Guru
Groups: Member
Joined: 6/11/2007
Posts: 2,294
Location: Brissy
|
in a battle of manliest woman in WWF/E history? 
|
|
Rank: Member
Groups: Member
Joined: 10/10/2008
Posts: 44
Location: sydney
|
chyna would win, Jackie woud beet beth aswell
|
|
Rank: Sports Guru
Groups: Member
Joined: 2/13/2006
Posts: 172
|
don't you mean XENA 
|
|
|
Guest |
