|
|
Rank: Sports Guru
Groups: Member
Joined: 2/22/2008
Posts: 1,007
Location: Sydney
|
Inny99 wrote:
It also requires you to play in a team without too many star players, as the points get spread throughout the star players in the team. The Broncos have always had great players in there team.
Danny buderus only needed to walk on the field to get 1 point. That was a joke 
|
|
Rank: Sports Guru
Groups: Member
Joined: 3/22/2005
Posts: 406
Location: Tatooine
|
Inny99 wrote:
It also requires you to play in a team without too many star players, as the points get spread throughout the star players in the team. The Broncos have always had great players in there team.
Sorry, but that's an excuse that doesn't wash. There are at least 15 winners from teams who were packed with internationals, from Ray Price in 1982 to Cam Smith in 2006. This isn't meant to bash Lockyer, merely to point out that a consistently dominant player will win the awards regardless of the players around them. How else do you explain Langers 1996 win? Stuarts win in 1993?
|
|
Rank: Sports Guru
Groups: Member
Joined: 2/13/2008
Posts: 1,628
Location: Aus
|
Its also very unreliable. I mean Buderus winning it was a complete joke, he'd have a shocker and still get 2 points.
Johns was another good example, he was getting votes in games he had absolutely no influence over.
But it is a shame he never did and never probably will win a Dally M. You'd think with a couple golden boots he'd have gone closer.
|
|
Rank: Sports Guru
Groups: Member
Joined: 8/26/2008
Posts: 2,279
Location: sydnney
|
Champion_man wrote:Its also very unreliable. I mean Buderus winning it was a complete joke, he'd have a shocker and still get 2 points.
Johns was another good example, he was getting votes in games he had absolutely no influence over.
But it is a shame he never did and never probably will win a Dally M. You'd think with a couple golden boots he'd have gone closer.
the judges are a farce. dazza only cares about real awards 
|
|
Rank: Sports Guru
Groups: Member
Joined: 6/7/2007
Posts: 3,483
|
He is the number 1 pill popper in the NRL
|
|
Rank: Sports Guru
Groups: Member
Joined: 8/26/2008
Posts: 2,279
Location: sydnney
|
pimpmaster wrote:He is the number 1 pill popper in the NRL he can do it all
|
|
Rank: Sports Guru
Groups: Member
Joined: 6/7/2007
Posts: 3,483
|
he cant tackle...unless it is a bar manager.
|
|
Rank: Sports Guru
Groups: Member
Joined: 8/26/2008
Posts: 2,279
Location: sydnney
|
pimpmaster wrote:he cant tackle...unless it is a bar manager. the GOAT shouldnt waste energy on defence.
|
|
Rank: Sports Guru
Groups: Member
Joined: 2/22/2008
Posts: 1,007
Location: Sydney
|
k.hunt wrote:
the GOAT shouldnt waste energy on defence.
That's why andrew johns was a league great. He was a playmaker that could tackle. Lockyer simply couldn't make the defensive adjustments from fullback to 5/8. Only thing stopping him from greatness.
|
|
Rank: Sports Guru
Groups: Member
Joined: 8/26/2008
Posts: 2,279
Location: sydnney
|
arsendragon wrote:
That's why andrew johns was a league great. He was a playmaker that could tackle. Lockyer simply couldn't make the defensive adjustments from fullback to 5/8. Only thing stopping him from greatness.
good tacklers dont break their jaws when trying to execute one.
|
|
|
Guest |
